Dinanath Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9224 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2016 Thana -DHAKA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Dinanath Rai, son of Late Roop Lal Rai, resident of Village- Sapgardha, P.S- Chiraiya, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Asif Kalim, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Dhaka P.S.Case No. 53 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 504, 506 and 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only allegation against him is that he has purchased land of the informant after creating forged document. However, husband of the informant as well as vendor of the petitioner are common ancestors and there is dispute between them for partition and informant has alleged that the purchased land of the petitioner falls in her share.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the nature of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9224 of 2017 (2) dt.28-02-2017 2/2 allegation let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahna at Dhaka, East Champaran, in connection with Dhaka P.S.Case No. 53 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U