Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9891/2017bail granted

Jitendra Kumar Yadav @ Jeetu v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9891 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -373 Year- 2016 Thana -BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Jitendra Kumar Yadav @ Jeetu, Son of Late Bheem Yadav, resident of village - Naya Tola, Barari, P.S. Barari, Distt. - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivekanand Vivek For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 The petitioner is in custody since 01.08.2016 in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No. 373 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 461/379 of Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in the present case as there is allegation of theft of biscuits in this case, however nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been languishing in judicial custody since 01.08.2016. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and period of custody, let petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9891 of 2017 (2) dt.01-03-2017 2/2 bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No. 373 of 2016, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U