Pramod Mukhiya @ Pramod v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15291 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15291 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -147 Year- 2016 Thana -BAIRIYA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Pramod Mukhiya @ Pramod, Son of Late Harihar Mukhiya @ Harihar Nishad, Resident of village- Bairiya, Police Station- Bairiya, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Bairiya P.S.Case No.147 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 498A, 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is father-inlaw and no specific allegation has been levelled against him. He is not living with the husband of the deceased. The petitioner is in custody for about five months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who could not controvert the above facts.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15291 of 2017 (2) dt.06-04-2017 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bairiya Police Station Case No.147 of 2016. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U