Ramvilash Rajvanshi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3817 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2017 Thana -ROUH District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Ramvilash Rajvansh, S/o Chandeshwar Rajvanshi,
2. Maho Rajvanshi, S/o Lalo Rajvanshi, Both resident of Village- Ajay Nagar, P.S.- Rupau, District- Nawada.
.... .... Petitioners/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Krishna Deo Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sharda Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.
Allegation is of recovery of 195.2 liters of country made liquor.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners rather their name disclosed by the persons apprehended on the spot. Further petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that petitioners have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3817 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 2/2 of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J-II Cum Special Judge, Nawada, in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part two appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T