Subhash Rai @ Ashish Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57641 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2020 Thana- INDUSTRIAL AREA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Subhash Rai @ Ashish Ranjan S/o Ram Ekwal Prasad R/o Mohalla - Sita Chowk, P.S - Town (Hajipur), Distt. - Vaishali. At present R/o vill - Simarwara, P.S. - Patepur, Distt. - Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Roy, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.J.N. Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-08-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Industrial Area P.S. Case No. 05 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per allegation, on 13.01.2020 at about 05:00A.M., four miscreants on two motorcycles came at the petrol pump and took petrol. Thereafter, on the point of pistol, they entered into cash counter and damaging the cash box, took away cash of Rs. 3 lakhs as also the CPU of the computer.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner's name has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57641 of 2024(2) dt.27-08-2024 2/2 figured in confessional statement of co-accused Vishal Kumar, who has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 8580 of 2021. He has further submitted that nothing was recovered from possession of the petitioner. He has also submitted that the petitioner is under custody since 04.06.2024.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the bail petition of the petitioner is disposed of with the observation that, he shall renew his prayer for bail after framing of the charges before the court below itself. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T