Amarjeet Ram @ Amarjeet Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46450 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2015 Thana -DURAULI District- SIWAN ======================================================
1. Amarjeet Ram @ Amarjeet Kumar, Son of Rudal Ram
2. Sima Kumari @ Sima Kumari Ram, Daughter of Rudal Ram
3. Malti Devi, Wife of Rudal Ram
4. Ranju Devi, Wife of Rajesh Ram
5. Mira Devi, Wife of Jawahar Ram
6. Kisan Ram @ Ravi Kishan Kumar @ Kisna Ram, Son of Jawahar Ram
7. Birendra Ram @ Virendra Prasad, Son of Late Sheomuni Ram
8. Dhirendra Ram @ Dharmendra Prasad, Son of Late Sheomuni Ram All are resident of Village- Sanwareji, P.S.- Bhatpar Rani, District- Deoria, Uttar Pradesh.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pronati Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2016 Heard both sides.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Darauli P.S. Case No. 86/2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant Jaleshwar Ram filed Complaint Case No. 1115/2015 on the basis of which the present F.I.R. was lodged. The informant made ten persons including the petitioner accused in the case for kidnapping of his minor daughter. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46450 of 2016 (2) dt.01-12-2016 2/2 entire allegation is false and concocted. The victim made her statement under Section 164 Cr. P.C. She alleged that she had gone to see Yagya. Her aunt Meera Devi requested her to accompany her to Naihar. She took sweets and became unconscious. She found herself at Bhairva Station. Her brother brought her to the house about a month ago. The victim did not name the petitioners. The victim did not make any sort of allegation or allege any ill-treatment at the hands of the petitioner. Petitioners are close relative of the victim.
Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners abovenamed, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Darauli P.S. Case No. 86/2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) Vinita/- U T