Omprakash Singh @ Suraj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64363 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2021 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== OMPRAKASH SINGH @ SURAJ S/O JAGRNATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- PARSAUNI JAHAGIR P.S. SAHEBGANJ, DISTRICTMUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 8, 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act and sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act .

As per the prosecution case, one loaded country-made pistol with a live cartridge and 500 gms of charas was recovered from possession of the petitioner.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 28.6.2021 and investigation in the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64363 of 2021(3) dt.13-05-2022 2/2 has concluded.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that huge quantity of charas was recovered from the petitioner's possession who also has five antecedents before this case.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the recovery of 500 gms of charas besides arms and ammunitions from possession of the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Spd/- U T