Virkhi Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20606 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -247 Year- 2017 Thana -ROSERA District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. Virkhi Devi, W/o Apeel Raut
2. Apeel Raut, S/o Ram Swaroop Raut
3. Kamal Raut, S/o Anup Raut All are Resident of Village-Vishanpur, P.S.- Rosra, Distt.-Samastipur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandan Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rosra P.S.Case No.247 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioners are mother-in-law, father-in-law and cousin father-in-law. The case is of dowry death.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20606 of 2018 (2) dt.26-04-2018 2/2 in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. 1st, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosra P.S.case No.247 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T