Rana Ranjay v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52520 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2025 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rana Ranjay S/o Jawahar Singh R/o Village- Banjariya, P.S- Madhuban, District - East Champaran at Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 333, 109, 76, 303(2), 351(2) and 351(3) of the BNS.

3. As per the FIR, it is alleged by the informant that all the named accused persons including the petitioner variously armed came to her house and Rana Ranjay (petitioner) assaulted the husband of the informant namely Bharat Bhushan with the butt of his pistol repeatedly causing head injury. It is further alleged that when the sons of the informant came to the rescue of their father the accused persons also assaulted them brutally.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and no such incident as alleged has occurred. It has further been submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52520 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 that the allegation of repeated assault by the petitioner on the husband of the informant is also falsified from the injury report of Bharat Bhushan which suggests only one simple injury on the right side of his head that too an incised wound which goes to show that the allegations of hitting the husband of the informant with the butt of the pistol is false. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner carries clean antecedent.

5. Heard learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection Madhuban P.S. Case No. 79 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below/court concerned subject to the conditions : (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative.

(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.

(iii). In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or in violation of the terms of the bail and if the prosecution is found involvement of the petitioner in similar nature of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52520 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 offence, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be canceled by the Court concerned.

(iv) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Prakash/- U