← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18560/2017bail granted

Ram Pravesh Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18560 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2012 Thana -AMBA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Bhuiyan S/o Kariman Bhuiya R/o Village-Parsawa Bighapar, P.S.-Amba, District-Aurangabad (Biahr) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar - 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is not named in the F.I.R. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Except confessional statement of the co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner. He is in custody for more than one year. It is further submitted that charge has been framed on 01.03.2017 but up-till-now no witness has been examined. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that he has remained in custody for more than one year and charge has already been framed in this case, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18560 of 2017 (3) dt.01-05-2017 2/2 five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI, Aurangabad (Bihar) in connection with S. Tr. No. 95A/13/13/17 arising out of Amba P.S. Case no. 45 of 2012 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T