Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10070/2017rejected

Ram Deyal Rai @ Ramdas Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-08Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10070 of 2017 (2) dt.08-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10070 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -230 Year- 2014 Thana -GARDANIBAGH District- PATNA ====================================================== Ram Deyal Rai @ Ramdas Rai, Son of Late Ramchandra Rai, resident of New Alkapuri, P.S.-Gardanibagh, District-Patna, State-Bihar..... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 10.05.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 13212 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 07.08.2015, he is an old man aged about 82 years and father-in-law of the deceased, there is no specific allegation against him and further the trial has not been concluded within nine months as directed by this Court as up-till-now no prosecution witness has been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

Learned APP submits that the deceased before her death has made allegation against the petitioner also for torturing and burning her.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10070 of 2017 (2) dt.08-03-2017 good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, at this stage, again his prayer for bail stands rejected. However, considering the period of detention, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may renew his prayer of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T