← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16397/2019dfd for non appearance

Baban Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-15The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16397 of 2019 ====================================================== Baban Kumar Singh S/o Late Jagdish Prasad Singh, resident of MohallaM.I.G.- 90, Housing Board Colony, Gaya, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar, Rural Works Department, Bisheshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road Patna. 2.

The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Bisheshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road Patna.

3.

The Chief Engineer-1, Rural Works Department, Bisheshwariya Bhawan, Bailey Road Patna.

4.

The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division Tekari, District- Gaya.

5.

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department , Works Division Tekari, District- Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay, GA 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-12-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "That this writ application is being file in the nature of writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 28.2.2019 passed by the Chief Engineer-1, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna and for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents' authorities to pay the dues of Rs. 83,37,719.77/- with 9% interest per annum, which was done by the petitioner as per agreement no. 8 SBD/15-16 dated 27.1.2016 for Construction of High Level RCC Bridge over

Patna High Court CWJC No.16397 of 2019(3) dt.15-12-2022 2/2 Dardh River between Panda Bigha, Village Samsara in Belaganj Block under Head- Naward and for issuance any appropriate writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions as your lordships may deem fit and proper."

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of intervening development, petition has become infructuous. As such he does not press the present petition. The present petition stands dismissed as not pressed for having become infructuous.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U