Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58191 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2021 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav Son of Late Keshav Yadav R/O Vill.- Ghurna Bigha, P.S.- Paliganj, Dist.- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suryajit Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Kishor Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 307, 448, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code & Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation against him is of assaulting the husband of the informant by lathi on head, causing injury.

4. The learned counsel submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is also submitted that rest of the accused have been granted the privilege of bail by the learned District Court itself. It is also submitted that petitioner is not aware about the nature of injury but then the blow

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58191 of 2024(2) dt.24-09-2024 2/2 was not repeated.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No.315/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. However, the learned trial court before accepting the bail bond of the petitioner shall verify the injury report of the injured and in the event if it is found that the injury suffered by the injured is grievous in nature, in that event, the anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to but if the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature, in that event, the bail bond shall be accepted forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T