Shubham Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52036 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2025 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Shubham Kumar Singh S/O Binod Singh R/O Village- Dhanadih, P.S.- Rasulpur, District- Saran 2.

Aman Raj S/O Devendra Kumar Singh R/O Village- Dhanadih, P.S.- Rasulpur, District- Saran 3.

Vinit Pandey @ Binit Pandey S/O Santosh Pandey R/O Village- Singhi, P.S.- Manjhi, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Avinash Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 118 of 2025 dated 29.06.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 51.84 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the sacks allegedly thrown by the petitioners and the co-accused person and a motorcycle was also recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52036 of 2025(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioners has sprung up in this case on mere suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the said motorcycle belongs to one Binod Singh, who is the father of the petitioner no.1 (Shubham Kumar Singh). The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner nos. 1 and 3 have clean antecedent and the petitioner no.2 has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 20.06.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners abovenamed, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Saran at Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 118 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T