Imran Ansari @ Ali Md. Imran @ Md. Imran v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64622 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1036 Year-2020 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Imran Ansari @ Ali Md. Imran @ Md. Imran Son of Akhtar Ansari R/o Village- Chhotka Koilehara, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Khushboo Nesha Nesh Wife of Imran Ansari @ Ali Md. Imran @ Md. Imran, D/o- Amin Ansari @ Shakil Ansari R/o Village- Knaya Gaw, P.S.- Shyampur Bhataha, District- Shivhar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Karandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, is said to have ousted the opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drover her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64622 of 2021(4) dt.26-07-2022 2/2 The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No.1036 of 2020 (Case No.935/2021), subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or for one time settlement.

Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T