← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57736/2024bail granted

Rajendra Rajbanshi @ Rajo Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-13Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57736 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2024 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Rajendra Rajbanshi @ Rajo Rajbanshi Son of Late Rajo Rajbanshi @ Nanhkuu Rajbanshi Resident of Village - Jandhaul, Police Station -Sirdalla, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a place near the house of the petitioner along with other recovery as detailed in FIR. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which is accessible to public at large

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57736 of 2024(2) dt.13-08-2024 2/3 and does not belong to the petitioner. It is next submitted that he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar and local people. It is further submitted that in majority of the cases, police implicates either at the instance of Chowkidar, local people, secret information or confessional statement without holding a proper investigation, when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 253 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7.

It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57736 of 2024(2) dt.13-08-2024 3/3 found that the petitioner has antecedent of even one case in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T