Ranju Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54941 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2021 Thana- AUANGARI District- Nalanda ====================================================== RANJU SINHA W/o Shesh Kumar Bhartendu R/o Village- Mohammadpur Mahuabagh, P.S.- Aungari (Pir Bigha), District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-01-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 341, 323, 379, 504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, the informant made a complaint that the husband of incharge Head master, Ranju Sinha used to come in half nude condition and also used to abuse children. The informant made a video of the said act and sent it to higher authority and due to that, on the order of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54941 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 2/3 petitioner, the co-accused persons assaulted the informant and Sintu Kumar with the butt of pistols and snatched golden chain and Rs. 10,300/-. The accused persons also fired on Sintu Kumar.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Injury of the injured is found to be simple in nature. The petitioner is only an order giver. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the informant is a habitual offender and the informant is accused in three other criminal cases as per supplementary affidavit file on behalf of the petitioner. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts, and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner as well as the material available in the case diary, let the above named petitioner, in the event of her arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54941 of 2022(2) dt.04-01-2023 3/3 satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nalanda in connection with Auangari P.S. Case No. 118 of 2021, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) niku/- U T