Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58001/2022bail rejected

Lalu Nut v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-24Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58001 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2022 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Lalu Nut Son of Late Dinanath Nut Resident of Village - Mangolapur, P.s.- Jalalpur, Distt.- Saran (Chapra.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 24-02-2023 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Marhowrah (Gaura O.P.) P.S. Case No. 262 of 2022 lodged under Section 394 of the I.P.C. read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, the allegation of snatching motorcycle is there against 3 unknown criminals. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown. He submits that name of the petitioner has figured in this case by virtue of confessional statement and C.C.T.V. footage. Counsel further submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58001 of 2022(5) dt.24-02-2023 2/2 there are 2 criminal cases pending against petitioner in which he is on bail. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2022. Counsel further submits that petitioner is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him by the Court.

Upon specific query from counsel for the petitioner that whether charge has been framed in this case or not, counsel submits that he is not confirmed that charge has been framed till date in this case or not.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present but liberty is hereby granted that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) sadique/- U T