Panchu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18062 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -10 Year- 2017 Thana -DARBHANGA RAIL P.S. DistrictSAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Panchu Sah, son of Late Mangal Sah, resident of Village- Fakdoliya, P.S.- Kusheshwar Sthan, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bam Bahadur Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Rail P.S. DBG.Case No. 10 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Section 370 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 79 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015.

As per FIR allegation against the petitioner is that he is an accused in human trafficking by taking minor children along with him for providing them job in Punjab and he was arrested at the Darbhanga Railway Station.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case as he has done nothing and petitioner is in custody for more than two months having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18062 of 2017 (2) dt.19-04-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Rail P.S. DBG.Case No. 10 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U