Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19046 of 2021 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Sunil Singh Resident of Village- Saidpura, P.S.- Surajgaraha, District- Lakhisarai, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Under Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Director, Secondary Education, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Bihar School Examination Board, through the Secretary, Fraser Road, Patna.
5.
The Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board, Fraser Road, Patna. 6.
The Controller of Examination (Misc.), Bihar School Examination Board, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Chandra, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Lalit Kishore ( AG ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2023
1. The petitioner has by way of this writ petiton prayed as under :- "1. That the present Writ Application is being filed for issuance of a Writ in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus commanding the Respondents Authority, especially Respondent No. 5 and 6, to rectify the name of the Mother of the Petitioner in the records of State Teachers Eligibility Test- 2019, including the Admit Card issued to the Petitioner for the said examination, as the Petitioner inadvertently while submitting his Application
2/6 Form for the said exam had mentioned his Mother's Name as Usha Devi instead of Archana Devi and to act strictly in accordance with law."
2. The counter-affidavit has been filed by the Respondents stating that the Board had after declaration of the result issued notification vide advertisement dated 13.09.2019, 27.09.2019, 16.12.2019 and 23.12.2019 providing opportunity to the candidates for seeking necessary corrections in their details. Thereafter, the examination was conducted and the result has been declared. Once the result has been declared, the details in the result need no correction and it was the duty of the petitioner to have corrected his details prior to participating in the selection process.
3. I have considered the submission. In Jigya Yadav Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors. as reported in 2021 (7) SCC 535, the Apex Court has held as under:- "192. Although we have discussed the broad issues canvassed before us, in the ultimate analysis the real dispute requiring resolution is about the nature of correction or change, as the case may be, permissible to be carried by the CBSE at the instance of the student including past student. As noted earlier, broadly, two situations would arise.
193. The first is where the incumbent wants "correction" in the certificate issued by the CBSE to be made consistent with the particulars mentioned in the school records.
193.1. As we have held, there is no reason for the CBSE to turn down such request or attach any precondition
3/6 except reasonable period of limitation and keeping in mind the period for which the CBSE has to maintain its record under the extant regulations. While doing so, it can certainly insist for compliance of other conditions by the incumbent, such as, to file sworn affidavit making necessary declaration and to indemnify the CBSE from any claim against it by third party because of such correction. The CBSE would be justified in insisting for surrender/return of the original certificate (or duplicate original certificate, as the case may be) issued by it for replacing it with the fresh certificate to be issued after carrying out necessary corrections with caption/annotation against the changes carried out and the date of such correction.
It may retain the original entries as it is except in respect of correction of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten. The fresh certificate may also contain disclaimer that the CBSE cannot be held responsible for the genuineness of the school records produced by the incumbent in support of the request to record correction in the original CBSE certificate. The CBSE can also insist for reasonable prescribed fees to be paid by the incumbent in lieu of administrative expenses for issuing fresh certificate. 193.2. At the same time, the CBSE cannot impose precondition of applying for correction consistent with the school records only before publication of results. Such a condition, as we have held, would be unreasonable and excessive.
We repeat that if the application for recording correction is based on the school records as it obtained at the time of publication of results and issue of certificate by the CBSE, it will be open to CBSE to provide for reasonable limitation period within which the application for recording correction in certificate issued by it may be entertained by it. However, if the request for recording change is based on changed school records post the publication of results and issue of certificate by the CBSE, the candidate would be entitled to apply for recording such a change within the reasonable limitation period prescribed by the CBSE. In this situation, the candidate cannot claim that she had no knowledge about the change recorded in the school records because such a change would occur obviously at her instance.
4/6 and which ought to be done within a reasonable time. 193.3. Indeed, it would be open to the CBSE to reject the application in the event the period for preservation of official records under the extant regulations had expired and no record of the candidate concerned is traceable or can be reconstructed. In the case of subsequent amendment of school records, that may occur due to different reasons including because of choice exercised by the candidate regarding change of name. To put it differently, request for recording of correction in the certificate issued by the CBSE to bring it in line with the school records of the incumbent need not be limited to application made prior to publication of examination results of the CBSE.
194. As regards request for "change" of particulars in the certificate issued by the CBSE, it presupposes that the particulars intended to be recorded in the CBSE certificate are not consistent with the school records. Such a request could be made in two different situations. The first is on the basis of public documents like birth certificate, Aadhaar card, election card, etc. and to incorporate change in the CBSE certificate consistent therewith. The second possibility is when the request for change is due to the acquired name by choice at a later point of time. That change need not be backed by public documents pertaining to the candidate.
194.1. Reverting to the first category, as noted earlier, there is a legal presumption in relation to the public documents as envisaged in the 1872 Act. Such public documents, therefore, cannot be ignored by the CBSE. Taking note of those documents, the CBSE may entertain the request for recording change in the certificate issued by it. This, however, need not be unconditional, but subject to certain reasonable conditions to be fulfilled by the applicant as may be prescribed by the CBSE, such as, of furnishing sworn affidavit containing declaration and to indemnify the CBSE and upon payment of prescribed fees in lieu of administrative expenses. The CBSE may also insist for issuing public notice and publication in the Official Gazette before recording the change in the fresh certificate to be issued by it upon surrender/return of the original certificate (or duplicate original certificate, as the case may be) by the applicant. The fresh certificate may contain disclaimer and caption/annotation against the original entry (except in respect of change of name
5/6 effected in exercise of right to be forgotten) indicating the date on which change has been recorded and the basis thereof. In other words, the fresh certificate may retain original particulars while recording the change along with caption/annotation referred to above (except in respect of change of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten).
194.2. However, in the latter situation where the change is to be effected on the basis of new acquired name without any supporting school record or public document, that request may be entertained upon insisting for prior permission/declaration by a court of law in that regard and publication in the Official Gazette including surrender/return of original certificate (or duplicate original certificate, as the case may be) issued by CBSE and upon payment of prescribed fees. The fresh certificate as in other situations referred to above, retain the original entry (except in respect of change of name effected in exercise of right to be forgotten) and to insert caption/annotation indicating the date on which it has been recorded and other details including disclaimer of CBSE. This is so because the CBSE is not required to adjudicate nor has the mechanism to verify the correctness of the claim of the applicant.
195. In light of the above, in exercise of our plenary jurisdiction, we direct the CBSE to process the applications for correction or change, as the case may be, in the certificate issued by it in the respective cases under consideration. Even other pending applications and future applications for such request be processed on the same lines and in particular the conclusion and directions recorded hitherto in paras 193 and 194, as may be applicable, until amendment of relevant bye-laws. Additionally, the CBSE shall take immediate steps to amend its relevant bye-laws so as to incorporate the stated mechanism for recording correction or change, as the case may be, in the certificates already issued or to be issued by it."
3. In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court, the right of the petitioner to get corrections done in the certificate of name of her Mother exists and considering
6/6 that the application had been moved for correction of the certificate by the petitioner, it is the responsibility of the Respondent Board to make the necessary correction after verification. In view of the Judgment passed by the Supreme Court in Jigya Yadav Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education & Ors.(supra).
4. Accordingly, the Board is directed to take steps and after verification make appropriate corrections in the certificate within a period of one month. If required, necessary expense for making corrections may be charged from the petitioner which he will deposit with the Board.
5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sachin/- Item No. 28 U