Ramesh Sahni @ Ramesh Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56881 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ramesh Sahni @ Ramesh Sahani Son of Late Laxmeshwar Sahni R/VVillage- Nima Baliya, (Belam) P.S.- Sakri, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-09-2024 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Sarkari P.S. Case No. 67 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 324, 307, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 05.04.2024 by the informant, Sushil Sahni.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 25.03.2024 while he was sitting in his room having tea, the petitioner alongwith his son-in-law came and started abusing him. Further, repeated knife blow was given by the petitioner in his abdomen while the co-accused Jay veer Sahni caught hold on his hands. This led to the intestine having been damaged, he was taken to CRIBS Hospital for treatment whereafter he was saved, the reason has also been assigned that informant had
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56881 of 2024(3) dt.25-09-2024 2/2 given him loan which was being demanded. Accordingly, the F.I.R.
4. Though learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court that there is case and counter case and both side have suffered injuries.
5. Learned APP Mr. Bharat Bhushan took this Court to the injury report which has come alongwith the case diary according to which the small intestine was damaged and the injury has been found to be grievous in nature.
6. In that background, no relief can be granted to the petitioner, accordingly this bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T