Saroj Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8684 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -193 Year- 2016 Thana -MAJHAULIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================

1. Saroj Yadav, Son of Late Jagdish Yadav.

2. Brij Kishore Yadav, Son of Late Jagdish Yadav. Both are residents of Village- Bahuarwa Bahashi Tola, Police StationMajhaulia, District- West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER --------------- 17-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No.193 of 2016 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is that due to land dispute, 4 persons, named in the F.I.R., including the petitioners came at the door of the informant and started to abuse, saying that they will not obey the decision of the Panchayati. On protest made by the informant Amardeo Yadav, Manoj Yadav caused injury through Farsa at his head whereas the petitioner no.2 Brij Kishroe Yadav caused injury through Bhala at the finger of right hand of Ishwar Yadav, the brother of the informant, and through

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8684 of 2018 (2) dt.17-02-2018 2/2 back portion of Bhala at the wife of the informant. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner no.1 Saroj Yadav. While allegation against the petitioner no.2 is to cause injury to Ishwar Yadav, the brother of the informant, as also the wife of the informant but the nature of injury of Ishwar Yadav is simple in nature whereas out of the four injuries of the wife of the informant, two are simple in nature and the opinion regarding the nature of two other injuries was kept reserved. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender by them within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, District-West Champaran, in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No.193 of 2016, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T