← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23688/2013disposed

Tarak Nath Singh And ANR. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-11-22Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23688 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1017 Year- 2012 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPATNA ======================================================

1. Tarak Nath Singh son of Late Duryodhan Singh

2. Lalati Devi wife of Late Duryodhan Singh Both are Residents Of Village Raghunathpur Kakariya, Police Station Dighwara, District Saran (Chapra).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Sunita Devi wife of Shri Tarak Nath Singh daughter of Baleshwar Singh Resident Of Village Raghunathpur Kakariya, Police Station Dighwara, District Saran (Chapra). At Present Resident Of Village Lanka Kachhuwara, Police Station Gaurichak, District Patna.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishore Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh-I(App) Sri Uma Shankar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-11-2016 After some argument, Sri Bashisth Narain Mishra, learned counsel, assisted by Sri Brij Kishore Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners, in presence of learned Additional Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Uma Shankar Singh , learned counsel for the complainant/ opposite party no. 2 makes a prayer for disposal of the present petition so that petitioners may take the plea which has been taken in the present petition before the court below at appropriate stage.

The prayer is allowed.

The petition stands disposed of with observation that if

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23688 of 2013 (5) dt.22-11-2016 2/2 at appropriate stage such petition is filed before the court below, the learned court below without being prejudiced with this order may examine the same and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.

It is made clear that this court has not recorded any opinion on the merit of the case.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U T