Manoj Nat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52230 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2025 Thana- Krishnabraham District- Buxar ====================================================== Manoj Nat S/o Late Keshav Nat Resident of village - Kathar, P.S.- Krishnabrahm, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Krishnabrahm P.S. Case No.82 of 2025 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 117(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 pending before the court of C.J.M., Buxar.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 8 named accused persons including the petitioner against whom there is allegation of assault and snatching of ornaments from informant and his female family members.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52230 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/2 case. He further submits that petitioner and informant belong to the same village and they are relative to each other. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.

5. Learned Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner to assault the informant and his family members.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, therefore the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioner, if he surrenders within 6 weeks from today and prays for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order without being prejudice of the present order preferably on the same day.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T