Lakshman Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24235 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -336 Year- 2017 Thana -TAJPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Lakshman Sahni S/o Dahu Sahni, R/o Vill.- Azizpur Chande Tola Nareshpur, P.S.- Patepur, Distt.- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Narayan Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 336 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 363, 365, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of POCSO Act. Allegation as per FIR is that 15-20 persons is that they came on motorcycles and assaulted the informant and others and it is also alleged that minor daughter of the informant was abducted by them. However, two of them were arrested and they have disclosed the name of the petitioner.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the victim girl has not named this petitioner in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. and further another co-accused having similar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24235 of 2018 (2) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 allegation has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.2.2018 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 9655 of 2018.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Samastipur, in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 336 of 2017, subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U