Renu Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6171 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -387 Year- 2017 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Renu Devi, aged about 55 years, daughter of Late Bihari Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Sultanpur Devi Ashtan, P.S.- Danapur, and District- Patna.

2. Pappu Yadav @ Kamlesh Yadav, aged about 48 years, Son of Late Bihari Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Sultanpur, Devi Ashthan, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

3. Bullu Yadav @ Anjani Yadav @ Tullu Yadav, aged about 49 years, Son of Late Bihari Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Sultanpur, Devi Ashthan, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Md. Helal Ahmad, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. For the Informant : M/S. Anil Kumar Sinha and Ajay Kumar Jain, Advocates.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2018 Vide order dated 05.02.2018, the petitioner no. 1 Renu Devi, has already been granted anticipatory bail by another Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner nos. 2 and 3, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A) and 304(B)/34 of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6171 of 2018 (4) dt.22-03-2018 2/3 persons including the petitioners killed the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. In paragraph no. 52 of the case diary, it has come that the petitioners are separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased. The petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are uncles of husband of the deceased.

On behalf of the learned counsels for the State and informant, it has been submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 namely Pappu Yadav @ Kamlesh Yadav and Bullu Yadav @ Anjani Yadav @ Tullu Yadav, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Danapur, Patna, in connection

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6171 of 2018 (4) dt.22-03-2018 3/3 with Danapur P.S. Case No. 387 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T