Smt. Prem Lata Rani v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2937 of 2011 ====================================================== Smt. Prem Lata Rani, wife of late Pankaj Kumar Sinha, resident of Mohalla Chandmari Road, Gali No.5, Police Station-Kankarbagh, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Neelmani, Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna having his office at Old Secretariat, Police StationSachivbalaya, Patna.

2. Sri A.S. Nimbsan, the Additional Director General, Special Branch, Old Secretariat, P.S. Sachivalaya, District Patna

3. Sri Ajit Kumar, the Superintendent of Police, Special Branch (A), Bihar, Patna, Harding Road, P.S. Sachivalaya, District Patna.

4. Sri M.R. Naik, the Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur

5. Sri Indrajeet Singh Dhaliwal, the Accountant General, Bihar, Patna having his office at Bir Chand Patel Path, Police Station-Kotwali, District-Patna

6. Sri Vinay Kumar, the Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, Exhibition Road, Branch, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Dinbandhu Singh GP9 For the Bank : Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan, Miss. Gunja, Advocates.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-05-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by and large the order of this Court has been complied with but certain benefits which the petitioner is entitled has not been taken care of.

In this view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the matter. However, it is made clear that if the petitioner is not satisfied with the action of the opposite party he may file proper representation before the authority concerned for his grievance and the authority will look into

Patna High Court MJC No.2937 of 2011 (10) dt.22-05-2015 the matter and pass a reasoned order. If such representation is filed the same should be disposed of within a period of four months from the date of filing.

With the aforesaid observation this application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U