Chunchun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16626 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANAN District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Chunchun Yadav, son of late Ramavtar Yadav, resident of village Sangrampur, Police Station Chanan, District Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2017 in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 129 of 2019 for the alleged offences under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event, there is case and counter case between the parties for a petty dispute with regard to fixing a 'Khunta' (peg) for tying the cows. Similarly situated accused persons, namely, Sunjeewan Kumar and Ranjeet Yadav have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 6110 of 2017. It is further submitted that even though injury no. 4 sustained by the informant's father which is attributed to the petitioner is grievous in nature, the same is not on vital part of the body but on little finger. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16626 of 2017 (2) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 of learned A.C.J.M. Ist, Lakhisarai in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 129 of 2019 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T