Pankaj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19433 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2015 Thana -HALSI District- LAKHISARAI ======================================================
1. Pankaj Yadav, Son of Baleshwar Yadav, Resident of VillageKharagwara, P.S.- Ramgarh Chowk, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Asharaf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail which was earlier rejected vide order dated 13.05.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 7119 of 2016, on the ground that the trial has not been concluded within nine months as per order given by this court, the two victims have been safely recovered, other coaccused Pawan Mandal, Ajay Ram, Dinesh Ram, Ranjit Saw, Bhuto Yadav and Md. Kalam from whose house the victims were recovered have already been allowed bail, without any legal and tangible material the petitioner is suffering in custody since 18.04.2015, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and, as such, the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19433 of 2017 (2) dt.24-05-2017 2/2 The learned A.P.P. fairly submits that Md. Kalam has also already been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 50092 of 2016 by another co-ordinate bench of this court.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Lakhisarai, in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 55 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T