Sandhya Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10196 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2017 Thana- BARAULI District- Gopalganj ======================================================
1. Sandhya Devi, Wife of Sumant Kumar Singh,
2. Santara Devi @ Sarita Devi, Wife of Rajnish Prasad @ Ranjeesh Kumar Both are Resident of Village- Mohanpur, P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. SRI RAM BILASH ROY RAMAN ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Barauli P.S. case no. 224 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304B, 201, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are the married Nand of the victim. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Barauli P.S. case no. 224
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10196 of 2018(2) dt.23-02-2018 2/2 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM XIV, Gopalganj, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T