Guddu Kumar @ Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52256 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2016 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== GUDDU KUMAR @ SATISH KUMAR Son of Late Arjun Ram Resident of Village- Sonsa, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv.
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin,APP For Informant ; Smt. Soni Srivastava, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-11-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Hisua P.S. Case No. 257 of 2016, disclosing offences under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of firing on the brother of informant causing injury on his stomach and during treatment, he succumbed to his injury.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion and except that there is nothing against the petitioner and even during the investigation nothing concrete has come against the petitioner.
Heard learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52256 of 2019(3) dt.05-11-2019 2/2 the petitioner. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the informant that some circumstances has come against the petitioner such as there was altercation between the deceased and petitioner in Jalmasha and in the case diary, it has also come that the petitioner was seen fleeing away from the place of occurrence and he is still evading his arrest, though the case is of the year 2016.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
This application is, accordingly, dismissed (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T