← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6447/2017bail granted

Md. Mansur @ Mansur Alam @ Md. Mansur Alam @ Mansoor Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-06Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6447 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2016 Thana -THAKURGANJ District- KISANGANJ ======================================================

1. Md. Mansur @ Mansur Alam @ Md. Mansur Alam @ Mansoor Alam S/o Late Tafalludin Resident of Village- Amaljhari, P.S. Thakurganj, P.O. Girnganj, District- Kishanganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Pd, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 06-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in custody since 11.04.2016 in connection with Thakurganj P. S. Case No. 41 of 2016 for offences punishable under Sections 489 (A), 489 (B) and 489 (C) of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that on secret information police personnel caught the petitioner red handed and on search, fake Currency notes of Rs. 500/- and Rs. 1000/- were found in his possession, totaling Rs. 1, 26,000/-.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, has not committed any offence of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6447 of 2017 (2) dt.06-03-2017 2/2 similar nature and that Sections 489A and 489 B are not attracted . He submits that charge sheet has already been submitted, hence there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. However, learned APP for the State submits that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report, hence, opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances and that charge sheet has already been submitted, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Kishanganj in connection with Thakurganj P. S. Case No. 41 of 2016, subject to the condition that one of the bailors must be a close relative of the petitioner possessing sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Police station/ Court below and will appear before the learned Court below as and when required, failure of which will be liable for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Nilu Agrawal, J) Sudha/- U T