← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./64411/2021dismissed

Kulshekhar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64411 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2020 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Kulshekhar Mishra Son Of Bijay Shankar Mishra @ Munmun Mishra Resident Of Village- Sonbarsa, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27, 35 of the Arms Act.

Petitioner is said to have fired upon the son of the informant as a result of which he died on the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64411 of 2021(5) dt.20-09-2022 2/2 levelled against the petitioner. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by the learned court below itself. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2020. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day considering the fact that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by the learned court below itself.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T