← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./238/2024disposed

Sunil Kumar v. The Union Of India

2025-10-14Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah,Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.238 of 2024 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1860 of 2012 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar son of Late Akhilesh Kumar, resident of Village-Dariyapur, P.S.- Udawant Nagar, District-Bhojpur, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Director General of Police, C.R.P.F. Block No-1, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003. 2.

The Inspector General, C.R.P.F. Bihar Sector, Patna. 3.

The Dy. Inspector General C.R.P.F. Bihar Sector, Patna. 4.

The Commandant 4th B.N., C.R.P.F. Smailpur (J and K), Government of India.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 14-10-2025 At the outset, the learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that though admittedly inordinate delay of 883 days has taken place in filing the present review petition, however realizing the fact that the present petition does not depict any of the grounds mentioned under Order 47, Rule (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 so as to warrant review of the order in question and moreover, there being no apparent error on the face of the record of the connected judgment dated 18.12.2021, passed in Letters Patent Appeal No.1860 of 2012,

Patna High Court C. REV. No.238 of 2024(3) dt.14-10-2025 2/2 seeks not to press the present petition, nonetheless seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to assail the said judgment dated 18.12.2021 by taking recourse to the due process of law, including that of filing a special leave petition before the Hon'ble Apex Court.

2. This Court is of the view that if the law so permits, the petitioner is not debarred from availing such remedies as are otherwise available under the law.

3. Accordingly, the present review petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ( Soni Shrivastava, J) kanchan/- U