Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5275/2018bail granted

Rudal Mandal @ Rudal Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-13Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5275 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -368 Year- 2017 Thana -SULTANGANJ District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Rudal Mandal @ Rudal Yadav, S/O Shravan Mandal.

2. Sunil Kumar, S/O Chandradev Mandal @ Guppi Mandal. Both R/VShahabad Pain, P.S. Akbarnagar, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Smt. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 200 liters wine is said to have been recovered.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 200 liters wine is recovered from the car in question. The car in question

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5275 of 2018 (3) dt.13-02-2018 2/2 does not belong to the petitioners. The name of the petitioners has come on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused Mukesh Kumar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (Excise), Bhagalpur, in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No. 368 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T