Patna High CourtMJC/877/2016disposed

Suresh Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Department Of Agriculture Govt. Of Bihar Namely

2018-01-17The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.877 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19607 of 2014 ====================================================== Suresh Prasad Singh, Son of Late Kedar Singh, Resident of Village-Maina Chatar, P.O-Sevai, P.S-Aliganj(Chandradeep), District-Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar Patna namely Sri Sudhir Kumar.

2. The Agriculture Director, Bihar, Patna namely Sri B. Kartikey.

3. The Director (Administration)-cum-Additional Secretary, Agriculture Director, Bihar, Patna namely Sri Prabhu Ram

4. The District Magistrate, Jamui namely Dr. Kaushal Kishore Singh

5. The Sub- Divisional Agriculture Officer, Lakhisarai namely Mr. M.P. Mandal

6. The Block Development Officer, Barhat, District- Jamui namely Mr. Prabhat Ranjan.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. N. Hoda Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 From the show cause filed by the respondents no. 4 to 6 and the averments made from 5 onward it is clear that the claim of the petitioner for grant of ACPs was placed before the District Screening Committee, Jamui on 19.01.2017 and on the basis of the entries made in the service book, ACP has been granted to the petitioner.

In view of the above, no further indulgence into the matter is called for. The claim of the petitioner having been settled in accordance to the averments made in the show cause and the documents and orders filed, Annexure-A series, no case for

Patna High Court MJC No.877 of 2016(3) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 further proceedings in the contempt is made out. The proceedings are discharged with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the action taken afresh in accordance with law in case the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting in the matter. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U