Manish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54586 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2025 Thana- Gadhiya Bazar District- East Champaran ====================================================== Manish Kumar S/O Babulal Rai @ Babulal Prasad Yadav Resident of villageMohammada chaube tola, P.S.- Mehsi, Dist.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per F.I.R., informant's brother Suresh Kumar, who was working in a Mobile Tower Company situated at Pakaridayal, solemnized marriage with one married lady Afrida Khatoon and both of them were living together in a rented house at Pakaridayal. It is further alleged that after some time of marriage, they started quarreling with each other whereafter the informant went there and came to know that the wife of informant's brother had illicit relation with co-accused Manish Kumar and thereafter, the informant shifted his brother and his wife to another place, but on 20.03.2025 at about 9:00 AM, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54586 of 2025(4) dt.20-11-2025 2/2 informant got an information that his brother has been killed. The informant believes that all the accused persons named in the FIR, committed murder of his brother.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence and only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner. This petitioner is alleged to have illicit relation with the wife of the deceased and because of this, he has been made accused in this case. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and he is in custody since 21.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the bail application.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Garahiya Bajar P. S. Case No. 51 of 2025.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) AjayMishra/- U T