← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65038/2021disposed

Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-21Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65038 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2021 Thana- SAHIYARA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

CHHOTU KUMAR S/o Abhiram Singh R/o Village - Sahpur Shitalpatti, P.S. - Sahiyara, Dist. - Sitamarhi.

2.

CHANDAN KUMAR S/o Devendar Kumar Singh R/o Village - Sahpur Shitalpatti, P.S. - Sahiyara, Dist. - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar Alok For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 57 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 379, 504, 506/34, 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, thirteen accused persons named in the FIR badly assaulted the members of the prosecution side. The specific allegation against petitioner No. 1 is that he inflicted deadly sword blow on the head of the informant's husband and petitioner No. 2 assaulted Nitesh Kumar Singh, son of the informant, with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65038 of 2021(2) dt.21-07-2022 2/2 sword, knife etc.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are the persons of clean antecedents. There is case and counter case.

Petitioner No. 1 Chhotu Kumar, inflicted deadly sword blow on the head of Sanjay Kumar, the husband of the informant due to which he sustained grievous injuries on his head. As such, petitioner No. 1 does not deserve the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. Nitesh Kumar, to whom there is allegation to cause injuries by the hands of petitioner No. 2, has sustained injuries which is simple in nature, as such, let the petitioner No. 2, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sitamarhi in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No.

57 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.