Saurav Aryan @ Arvind Kumar Thakur @ Arvind Kumar @ Arvind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56482 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2022 Thana- LAURIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

SAURAV ARYAN @ ARVIND KUMAR THAKUR @ ARVIND KUMAR @ ARVIND SON OF BHEEM THAKUR R/O WARD NO. 03, LAURIYA, P.S.- LAURIYA, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN, BIHAR- 845453 2.

SUMAN THAKUR @ SOBHAN THAKUR @ SHOBHAN THAKUR SON OF BANKA THAKUR R/O WARD NO. 03, LAURIYA, P.S.- LAURIYA, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN, BIHAR- 845453 3.

RAMA THAKUR @ RAJA THAKUR @ RAJA KUMAR THAKUR SON OF BANKA THAKUR R/O WARD NO. 03, LAURIYA, P.S.- LAURIYA, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN, BIHAR- 845453 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pratik Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioners have indiscriminately assaulted the informant's side by means of various weapons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56482 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that there is a case and counter-case between the parties. He further submits that both sides have sustained grievous injuries. Petitioner no.1 and 3 have one criminal antecedent and petitioner no.2 have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as both sides have sustained grievous injuries, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Lauriya P.S. Case No.171 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T