Anandi Sharma @ Anandi Mistri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57801 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-511 Year-2023 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Anandi Sharma @ Anandi Mistri S/o Late Sukhadev Mistri R/o vill - Imamganj, P.S - Rahui, Distt. - Nalanda, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gaurav Prakash, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 511 of 2023 dated 22.11.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 302, 326, 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the co-accused, Rahul Kumar killed the informant's son under conspiracy with the assistance of the petitioner and the other co-accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case only on the basis of secret information. The specific allegation is against the co-accused, Rahul Kumar. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is the member of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57801 of 2024(2) dt.31-08-2024 2/2 mob. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged offence. Similarly situated co-accused has already been granted anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 18.03.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 11266 of 2024. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nalanda, in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No. 511 of 2023.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Jyoti/- U T