Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5112/2017bail granted

Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5112 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -403 Year- 2016 Thana -MOHANIA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================

1. Pintu Yadav, S/o Sri Bansh Narayan Yadav, resident of VillageKaramhari, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Pd Singh Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Mohania P.S.Case no.403 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except the suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for about six months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides. In view of the fact that except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner and he is in custody for about six months, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5112 of 2017 (2) dt.15-02-2017 2/2 satisfaction of C.J.M., Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Mohania P.S.Case No.403 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U