Bal Mukund Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2263 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10005 of 2009 =========================================================== Bal Mukund Singh Son of Sri Satya Narayan Singh Resident of VillageSadanandpur, P.s Ballia, District Begusarai. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

2. The District Magistrate ,Kishanganj.

3. The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Co-Education Project ,Bihar,Patna.

4. The Block Development Officer, Terhagachhi Block, District Kishanganj.

5. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat , Chilhaniya.

6. Panchayat Sachiv ,Gram Panchayat , chilhaniya, P.s Terhagachhi,District Kishanganj.

7. The Member ,District Teacher Employment Appellate Tribunal , Kishanganj. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Saket Tiwary For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar, AC to SC-24 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 04-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as the State.

There is delay of almost three years and little over five months. The reason indicated is that the appellant did not have any knowledge. He came to know of the same through an Advocate Clerk after much delay and, therefore, the condonation should be allowed.

Patna High Court LPA No.2263 of 2015 dt.04-02-2017 2/2 Such made up stories cannot form the basis for condonation.

The limitation petition, which is I. A. No. 9831 of 2015, is dismissed. As a consequence thereof, even the appeal is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 06.02.2017 Transmission Date