Ajay Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22489 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -245 Year- 2016 Thana -HARSIDHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Ajay Sahni Son of Late Dukhi Sahni, Resident of Village- Bairiya Belpura, Police Station- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Amrendra Kumar Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kishore Pd.,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 245 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/26 and 35of the Arms Act. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 20.2.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 48955 of 2016 with the observation that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the charge has been framed which will appear from the impugned order dated 27.3.2017 and further the petitioner has now remained in custody for about nine months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22489 of 2017 (3) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the observations as well as considering the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 245 of 2016. .

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) S.Pandey/- U T