Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8920/2017bail granted

Ram Balak Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8920 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8920 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -219 Year- 2016 Thana -NANHPUR District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Ram Balak Sah, Son of Late Budhan Sah, Resident of village - Sheohar Nagar Panchayat, Ward No. 3, P.S. Sheohar, District - Sheohar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2016 in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 219 of 2016 for the alleged offences under Sections 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely on suspicion and the FIR is against 15-16 unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has surfaced on the confessional statement of one Bachchu Sahni, being accused of Sheohar P.S. Case No. 150 of 2016 in which case the petitioner is on bail.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody since 08.11.2016 already suffered, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8920 of 2017 (2) dt.23-02-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pupari at Sitamarhi in connection with Nanpur P.S. Case No. 219 of 2016 on the following conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii)That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T