Rajiv Nayanam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.2273 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17570 of 2015 ======================================================
1. Rajiv Nayanam, Son of late Janardan Prasad Sharma, Resident of Quammruddin Ganj, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda, at present on deputation to NHAI, New Delhi as Manager (Technical) .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishwasaraiya Bhawan, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department , Vishwasaraiya Bhawan, Patna.
3. National Highway Authority of India, through Deputy Manager (HR /Admn-II), NHAI, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway, G-526, Sector -10, Dwarka , New Delhi.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. D.K. Sinha, AAG-2 Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi, AC to AAG-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 29-01-2016 Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, and Mr. D.K. Sinha, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the State. In view of the fact that in compliance of the direction given by order, dated 27.11.2015, passed in C.W.J.C. No.17570 of 2015, which stands impugned in this appeal, the respondents have already passed order, dated 22.1.2016,
Patna High Court LPA No.2273 of 2015 (6) dt.29-01-2016 2/2 accepting the resignation, which has been submitted by the sole writ petitioner-appellant, it is submitted, on behalf of the appellant, that the appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the appeal is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the appellant to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U