Rohit Pandey @ Rohit Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54106 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2016 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Rohit Pandey @ Rohit Tiwari Son of Ravindra Tiwari, RO Village -Chitaukhar, PS -Nasariganj, District -Rohtas, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 07 of 2016 dated-09.01.2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 395, 328, 412 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per allegation, the truck of the informant was snatched on road by four unknown persons, who had come in a Scorpio vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown persons and no T.I.P. has been conducted, nor any case property has been recovered from the possession of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54106 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 2/3 petitioner. He further submits that seven co-accused persons have already been enlarged on regular bail by Co-ordinate Benches of this Court or District Court.
5. He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 24.04.2025.
6. It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner has two criminal antecedents.
7. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one.
8. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail.
9. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, abovenamed, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court below in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 07 of 2016, on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54106 of 2025(2) dt.12-08-2025 3/3 investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer. (iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Jitendra Kumar, J.) ravishankar/- U T