← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57691/2015dismissed

Chandan Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2016-01-21Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 57691 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2015 Thana -CHHATAUNI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Chandan Ram son of Bharat Ram, Resident of Village- Raghunathpur, P.O.+P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. D.P.Tiwari (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

21-01-2016 Heard Sri Pravin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The petitioner, who is in custody in Chhatauni P.S. Case no. 69 of 2015 registered for the offence under Sections 307, 326/34 of the Indian Penal Code, subsequently section 302 of the I.P.C. was added and section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, has prayed for grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he was not named in the F.I.R., only on the basis of confession of coaccused, the petitioner has been implicated in the present case. He further argued that the petitioner at the time of occurrence was inside jail and during his imprisonment, the petitioner has been made accused in number of cases on false accusation. On

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57691 of 2015 (2) dt.21-01-2016 2/2 aforesaid grounds, he has made a prayer for grant of bail. Sri D.P.Tiwari, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor opposing the prayer for bail of the petitioner submits that during investigation the fact has come that the petitioner from inside jail got the murder executed on contract basis.

Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the materials available on record. On perusal of paragraph - 3 of the petition, it is evident that the petitioner is accused in altogether 20 cases of serious nature. Keeping in view the antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail.

The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T