← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./158/2021dismiss for nonprosecution

State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, v. M/S Sona Gold Agrochem Pvt. Ltd.

2025-04-24Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.158 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12059 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Vikash Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2.

The Director of Industries, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhavan, Bailey Road, Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

M/S Sona Gold Agrochem Pvt. Ltd. A Private Limited Company incorporated under the Provisions of Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at Mohali Road, Karmalichak, Patna City, District Patna - 80009 through its Managing Director Amar Kasera, sons of late Shree Gopal Kasera, Resident of 2-A, Narayan Nilamay, Road no. -6, Rajendra Nagar, P.S. Kadamkuan, District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohit Agarwal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-04-2025 No one appears on behalf of the State despite the call made.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for Review of the Judgment/order dated 12.03.2021 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12059 of 2017 M/S Sona Gold Agrochem Private Limited Versus The State of Bihar and others under which the writ petition of the respondent herein-original writ petitioner was allowed in the light of the judgment

Patna High Court C. REV. No.158 of 2021(6) dt.24-04-2025 2/2 and order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12104 of 2018 and other analogous cases (M/S Sunny Stars Hotels Private Limited Versus The State of Bihar and others)."

3. The defect was pointed out on 08.8.2023. It was not removed and as such, on 18.08.2023, the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) directed the State to remove the defects by 15.09.2023.

4. The State chose not to comply the order and as such, on 13.02.2025, a Coordinate Bench gave four weeks' time to remove the defects.

5. Neither the defects were removed nor the State chose to appear on 20.03.2025 and 03.04.2025 before the Coordinate Bench as per the order nos. 4 and 5.

6. Today also, on repeated call, there is no appearance.

7. The present petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U