Chand Ramani Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.157 of 2017 (3) dt.20-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.157 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -817 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM MUFFSIL District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. CHAND RAMANI KUMAR SON OF PURNMASI SINGH.

2. MANTU KUMAR SON OF RAMCHELA MAHTO

3. SANDESH MAHTO SON OF BHAIYA RAM MAHTO.

ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-ADMAPUR, P.S.- SASARAM(M), DISTRICT-ROHTAS.

.... .... APPELLANT/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... RESPONDENT/S ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Usha Kumar No.1, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 20-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned Special Public Prosecutor.

From the order impugned, it is evident that cognizance of offence had already been taken including that of SC/ST (POA) Act. In view of principle laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Bachu Das vs. State of Bihar & Ors. reported in (2014) 3 SCC 471 instant memo of appeal for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. Accordingly, dismissed.

However, during course of appreciation of regular bail the learned lower court will not find influenced by the instant order. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) Prakash Narayan U T