Marani Devi @ Soni Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12362 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2016 Thana -AURAI District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Marani Devi @ Soni Devi, wife of Puran Das, resident of village Prayagchak, P.S. Aurai, Distt. Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murlidhar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Aurai P.S. Case No. 49 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased.
From the written report it appears that there is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Aurai P.S. Case No. 49 of 2016, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12362 of 2018 (2) dt.28-02-2018 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge 14th cum Assistant Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T